What Workplaces Lose When They Lose Play
Play is often dismissed as something separate from serious work, but it may be one of the conditions that helps people think, connect, and adapt,
In this volunteer reflection, we explore what workplaces lose when curiosity, experimentation, and low-pressure creativity disappear.
There is a moment in Saul Blinkoff's keynote from LEAPCon that stayed with me long after the session ended. Blinkoff, a Disney producer and animator, asked the audience to do something simple: draw Mickey Mouse. First, from memory! What happened next was more revealing than anything on the images. Adults tensed up. Some laughed nervously (me). Others apologized before their pens even touched the paper. Several said aloud, "I'm not creative," (also me) as though that settled the matter.
The drawing was never really the point. The reaction was.
Over time, many workplaces settle into a low-grade but persistent orientation toward performance, evaluation, and self-monitoring that makes genuine curiosity very difficult to sustain. Most of us stopped noticing that anything had been lost.
Play as a Cognitive Condition
What researchers like Stuart Brown have documented for decades is that play operates at a more fundamental level than most workplace conversations acknowledge. Play is one of the primary mechanisms through which the brain builds flexibility, tolerance for uncertainty, and the capacity to learn. Brown's research frames play as foundational to adaptability, which is a word organizations use constantly and cultivate rarely (Brown & Vaughan, 2009).
The neuroscience is worth taking seriously here. Neuroscientist Amy F.T. Arnsten's research on the prefrontal cortex shows that chronic stress literally narrows the brain's cognitive range. Under sustained pressure, the neural systems responsible for complex reasoning, perspective-taking, and creative problem-solving become less accessible (Arnsten, 2009).
The brain, in survival mode, defaults to what is known and proven rather than what might be possible. Play, by contrast, activates what psychologist Barbara Fredrickson calls the "broaden-and-build" effect: positive emotional states, including those associated with curiosity and exploration, expand the range of thoughts and actions available to a person in any given moment. That broadened range is where creativity lives (Fredrickson, 2001).
This is a structural argument, and a serious one. The conditions that support play overlap almost entirely with the conditions that support innovation.
The Early Insight Some Organizations Already Understood
In the early 2000s, Google's "20% time" policy became something of a legend. Engineers were given structured time to explore projects outside their primary responsibilities. Gmail, Google News, and AdSense all emerged from that unstructured space. The popular narrative around this policy tends to focus on the outputs, which misses why it worked. The conditions it created were psychological as much as creative: a signal to employees that curiosity was valued, that experimentation was permitted, that imperfection during exploration would not be punished.
That is what Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety describes as the foundation of high-performing teams. Her work at Harvard has consistently shown that teams where members feel safe to take interpersonal risks, offer ideas, and acknowledge mistakes outperform teams where those behaviors are discouraged (Edmondson, 1999). Edmondson's psychological safety is best understood as the structural permission to be a learning organism rather than a performing one.
Play and psychological safety are deeply related. Both require the same underlying condition: that the cost of imperfection is low enough to try something new.
What Gets Lost When Workplaces Optimize Everything
Many organizations have spent the last decade optimizing for urgency, responsiveness, and measurable output. In some respects, this has worked. Processes are leaner. Communication is faster. Accountability is more visible. Yet, optimization has a shadow side that is harder to quantify.
When every hour is accounted for and every project is monitored, the low-pressure cognitive states that allow for genuine insight rarely have room to form. Curiosity requires slack. Experimentation requires the tolerance for outcomes that are not immediately useful. Connection, the kind that builds trust and collaboration over time, requires unhurried presence. These are inputs, not inefficiencies.
The consequences of their absence show up eventually as reduced creative output, increased risk aversion, difficulty retaining high performers who want to grow, and teams that execute well but rarely generate anything genuinely new.
Why This Matters More Now, Not Less
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to absorb more routine cognitive and analytical work, the human contribution to organizational life will increasingly depend on capacities that cannot be automated: imagination, discernment, relational attunement, ethical judgment, and the ability to navigate genuinely novel situations. These capacities are strengthened through environments that support exploration, tolerate ambiguity, and allow the nervous system enough safety to actually think.
Play is one of the oldest and most reliable ways that humans have always practiced these capacities. We did not evolve to stop.
A Closing Thought
Returning to that room at LEAPCon: the people who loosened up and drew Mickey Mouse, imperfectly and without apology, were demonstrating something important. A willingness to engage without needing the outcome to be perfect first.
That willingness is, in many ways, the beginning of everything that makes work meaningful and organizations genuinely effective. Play may be one of the conditions that makes both wellbeing and performance possible.
Wellbeing Think Tank brings together people who care deeply about creating healthier, more human workplaces. Learn how to join our community and stay connected to evidence-based learning and events throughout the year.
If you believe accessible, trusted resources should continue to be available to all, consider making a tax-deductible donation. Your support helps us continue to offer education you can trust, inspiration that you need, and resources so you can take action for wellbeing.
